Confermo che l'aereo era un 737-500, marche N18611.
Questi i metar al momento dell'incidente.
KDEN 210153Z 30018G28KT 10SM FEW040 SCT100 M05/M17 A3000 RMK AO2 PK WND 28036/0123 SLP202 T10501172
KDEN 210134Z 29024G32KT 10SM FEW040 SCT100 M04/M18 A2998 RMK AO2 PK WND 28036/0123
KDEN 210053Z 28011KT 10SM FEW040 SCT100 M06/M16 A2997 RMK AO2 PK WND 29027/0000 SLP202 T10561161
Le prime indagini preliminari sono indirizzate verso una raffica improvvisa di vento.
Sembra inoltre che la maggior parte delle ferite siano state provocate dal fatto che gli scivoli non toccavano terra nel fossato, ma vi era un salto di circa 2 metri.
Aereo Continental esce fuori pista in decollo a Denver
Moderatore: Staff md80.it
- albert
- md80.it Staff
- Messaggi: 5850
- Iscritto il: 9 ottobre 2007, 2:16
- Località: Liguria
Re: Aereo Continental esce fuori pista in decollo a Denver
Alberto
MD80 Fan
«Ogni domanda alla quale si possa dare una risposta ragionevole è lecita.» Konrad Lorenz
«Un sogno scaturito da un grande desiderio: la grande voglia di volare e scoprire altri orizzonti verso i quali andare, con la voglia di nuovo. Per me questa è l'avventura.» Angelo D'Arrigo
«Non prendete la vita troppo sul serio, comunque vada non ne uscirete vivi.» Robert Oppenheimer
MD80 Fan
«Ogni domanda alla quale si possa dare una risposta ragionevole è lecita.» Konrad Lorenz
«Un sogno scaturito da un grande desiderio: la grande voglia di volare e scoprire altri orizzonti verso i quali andare, con la voglia di nuovo. Per me questa è l'avventura.» Angelo D'Arrigo
«Non prendete la vita troppo sul serio, comunque vada non ne uscirete vivi.» Robert Oppenheimer
- araial14
- FL 500
- Messaggi: 11575
- Iscritto il: 19 giugno 2007, 15:25
- Località: Torino (Italia) Bahia (Brasile)
- JT8D
- Administrator
- Messaggi: 20389
- Iscritto il: 2 agosto 2005, 20:38
- Località: Limbiate (MB)
- Contatta:
Re: Aereo Continental esce fuori pista in decollo a Denver
"La corsa di decollo è una metamorfosi, ecco una quantità di metallo che si trasforma in aeroplano per mezzo dell'aria. Ogni corsa di decollo è la nascita di un aeroplano" (Staccando l'ombra da terra - D. Del Giudice)


- albert
- md80.it Staff
- Messaggi: 5850
- Iscritto il: 9 ottobre 2007, 2:16
- Località: Liguria
Re: Aereo Continental esce fuori pista in decollo a Denver
A distanza di poche ore dall'accaduto, e vedendo anche le fotografie pubblicate online, abbiamo due sole certezze: la prima, e più importante, è che l'evento, potenzialmente disastroso, si è concluso veramente bene; la seconda è che l'aereo non è riparabile.JT8D ha scritto:Report preliminare ASN:
http://aviation-safety.net/database/rec ... 20081220-0
Paolo

Per tutto il resto possiamo tranquillamente attendere i risultati dell'inchiesta.
Ciao!
Alberto
MD80 Fan
«Ogni domanda alla quale si possa dare una risposta ragionevole è lecita.» Konrad Lorenz
«Un sogno scaturito da un grande desiderio: la grande voglia di volare e scoprire altri orizzonti verso i quali andare, con la voglia di nuovo. Per me questa è l'avventura.» Angelo D'Arrigo
«Non prendete la vita troppo sul serio, comunque vada non ne uscirete vivi.» Robert Oppenheimer
MD80 Fan
«Ogni domanda alla quale si possa dare una risposta ragionevole è lecita.» Konrad Lorenz
«Un sogno scaturito da un grande desiderio: la grande voglia di volare e scoprire altri orizzonti verso i quali andare, con la voglia di nuovo. Per me questa è l'avventura.» Angelo D'Arrigo
«Non prendete la vita troppo sul serio, comunque vada non ne uscirete vivi.» Robert Oppenheimer
-
- FL 150
- Messaggi: 1635
- Iscritto il: 14 novembre 2006, 17:59
- Località: Milano Malpensa
Re: Aereo Continental esce fuori pista in decollo a Denver
Continental 737 crash: Pilot called for rejected take-off
Cockpit voice-recorder evidence shows one of the pilots of the Continental Airlines Boeing 737-500 involved in the runway excursion accident at Denver called for a rejected take-off.
The US National Transportation Safety Board says the call came just four seconds after the recorder picked up a "bumping and rattling sound" as the jet accelerated down runway 34R on 20 December.
During a briefing on the accident a spokesman for the NTSB stated that the CVR showed "nothing out of the ordinary" during pre-flight checks and taxi-out for the service to Houston. The NTSB has also reportedly said there is no evidence of any problems with the CFM International CFM56 engines, thrust reversers, brakes or flaps.
Twenty-eight seconds after the brakes were released, says the spokesman, one of the pilots stated that take-off power was set. But 41s after release, a "bumping and rattling" began, and the call to reject take-off came at 45s.
There was no debris on the runway, which was bare and dry. Main landing-gear tyre marks started 1,900ft from the runway 34R threshold and nose-gear marks began 100ft further on.
The jet then began to veer off the centreline, says the spokesman, exiting the runway at 2,650ft from the threshold. It travelled into a grassy area before crossing taxiway WC and striking a berm.
As a result of the inertia from the impact, and the profile of the terrain, the aircraft "slightly became airborne". From the point at which it left the runway, the 737 travelled around 2,000ft before coming to rest.
The rattling sound continued to the end of the cockpit-voice recording, at 51s. The spokesman indicates that the recording was ended by the triggering of a deceleration 'g-switch', probably from the aircraft's impact with the ground after it struck the berm.
Information from the flight-data recorder information is "very good", he adds, and shows that the jet reached a maximum speed of 119kt. At the point where the flight-data recording ceased - again, possibly due to the ground impact - the aircraft was moving at 89kt.
Despite the aircraft's suffering severe structural damage and a fire around the right rear fuselage, none of the 115 occupants was killed, although dozens were taken to hospital with varying degrees of injury.
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/20 ... e-off.html
Cockpit voice-recorder evidence shows one of the pilots of the Continental Airlines Boeing 737-500 involved in the runway excursion accident at Denver called for a rejected take-off.
The US National Transportation Safety Board says the call came just four seconds after the recorder picked up a "bumping and rattling sound" as the jet accelerated down runway 34R on 20 December.
During a briefing on the accident a spokesman for the NTSB stated that the CVR showed "nothing out of the ordinary" during pre-flight checks and taxi-out for the service to Houston. The NTSB has also reportedly said there is no evidence of any problems with the CFM International CFM56 engines, thrust reversers, brakes or flaps.
Twenty-eight seconds after the brakes were released, says the spokesman, one of the pilots stated that take-off power was set. But 41s after release, a "bumping and rattling" began, and the call to reject take-off came at 45s.
There was no debris on the runway, which was bare and dry. Main landing-gear tyre marks started 1,900ft from the runway 34R threshold and nose-gear marks began 100ft further on.
The jet then began to veer off the centreline, says the spokesman, exiting the runway at 2,650ft from the threshold. It travelled into a grassy area before crossing taxiway WC and striking a berm.
As a result of the inertia from the impact, and the profile of the terrain, the aircraft "slightly became airborne". From the point at which it left the runway, the 737 travelled around 2,000ft before coming to rest.
The rattling sound continued to the end of the cockpit-voice recording, at 51s. The spokesman indicates that the recording was ended by the triggering of a deceleration 'g-switch', probably from the aircraft's impact with the ground after it struck the berm.
Information from the flight-data recorder information is "very good", he adds, and shows that the jet reached a maximum speed of 119kt. At the point where the flight-data recording ceased - again, possibly due to the ground impact - the aircraft was moving at 89kt.
Despite the aircraft's suffering severe structural damage and a fire around the right rear fuselage, none of the 115 occupants was killed, although dozens were taken to hospital with varying degrees of injury.
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/20 ... e-off.html