Senza dubbio una pessima figura per la Germania.
Per ora non ho altre informazioni, ma sia AirBerlin che Lufthansa mi hanno confermato la notizia, ahimé avrei dovuto partecipare ad un volo speciale di AirBerlin in concomitanza con l'inaugurazione.


Moderatore: Staff md80.it
Sì è qualche mese che c'è il LIN-TXL, è una coppia di voli (durante la settimana, non ricordo se sono due o uno solo nel weekend). Il secondo volo arriva la sera tardi, l'aereo dorme a LIN, generalmente un 737, e riparte la mattina presto.MarcoGT ha scritto:Ma prima dell'apertura di BER esisteva un LIN - Berlino (TXL o SXF)?
Anche io non ho ancora ricevuto comunicazioni...N176CM ha scritto:Non capisco invece il totale silenzio di Lufthansa a due giorni dalla notizia. Non ho trovato nemmeno un comunicato stampa ufficiale nella sezione tedesca del sito e, cosa ancor più grave, ancora stamattina sono regolarmente prenotabili voli da e per BER![]()
![]()
Non vorrei sbagliare e neanche scatenare un flame ma non mi sembra che il BBI sia il primo aeroporto al mondo a subire un ritardo nell'apertura. E dubito anche che LH si atterrerà in mezzo a un cantiere. Sicuramente la situazione è complessa ma immagino che in qualche modo la risolveranno. O almeno lo spero. Ho un volo prenotato per BER con Easyjet e spero di non ritrovarmi a Cracovia.FAS ha scritto:questi vanno sempre al 150% anche nell'essere idioti......
efficienza tettesca
Easyjet ha comunicato che continuerà ad operare da SXF, quindi niente CracoviaDefiant ha scritto:Non vorrei sbagliare e neanche scatenare un flame ma non mi sembra che il BBI sia il primo aeroporto al mondo a subire un ritardo nell'apertura. E dubito anche che LH si atterrerà in mezzo a un cantiere. Sicuramente la situazione è complessa ma immagino che in qualche modo la risolveranno. O almeno lo spero. Ho un volo prenotato per BER con Easyjet e spero di non ritrovarmi a Cracovia.FAS ha scritto:questi vanno sempre al 150% anche nell'essere idioti......
efficienza tettesca
May 14 , 2012
Lufthansa and Air Berlin will claim damages from Berlin Airports to compensate for the delayed opening of Brandenburg International Airport (BBI).
The airport company last week conceded that the planned June 3 opening date for BBI cannot be maintained, with CEO Rainer Schwarz citing issues with the terminal fire protection system. Numerous reports have since indicated that other aspects of the projects also are lacking, and according to one article, the airport’s completion is two months behind schedule.
Air Berlin is hardest hit by the delay because the airline was about to introduce a six-wave hub-and-spoke system with the new airport, which it cannot implement at Berlin Tegel Airport. Lufthansa, too, has plans to boost capacity in Berlin 40% when it shifts operations to BBI.
The two large German airlines now want to start operations at BBI at the end of October, when demand is weaker, reflecting an initial launch plan for 2011 before delays pushed the opening to June.
Brandenburg Prime Minister Matthias Platzeck and Berlin Mayor Klaus Wowereit last week pushed for a new opening date at the end of August, but given industry opposition, that is becoming increasingly unlikely.
Airport Delays Undermine Image of German Efficiency
The ambitious Berlin airport project conceived two decades ago as a glittering symbol of German unification and the city’s importance as a global hub has hit yet another delay and may not open before late next year, officials said Tuesday.
An opening originally set for last year, then this past June and then postponed until next March, may now be pushed back again — until at least October 2013.
Officials cite various technical and budgetary problems that have turned the Berlin-Brandenburg Willy Brandt Airport — now estimated at more than €4 billion, or $5 billion, an estimated €1.2 billion over budget — from an emblem of German know-how into a source of local embarrassment. And it does not help that cabin crews for the country’s flag-carrier airline, Lufthansa, are on strike, stranding travelers at airports that include Berlin’s aging, overburdened Tegel airport.
The endless series of delays, coming atop several recent breakdowns of the city’s main commuter railway and its main soccer team’s dropping out of the country’s premiere league has made Berlin, despite its flair for making the down-and-out seem attractive, the butt of jokes across the country. “Berlin — we can do everything, but nothing right,” is the motto that German media organizations have lately proposed.
But the setbacks at the airport could have more serious consequences, particularly for two local politicians — Matthias Platzeck and Klaus Wowereit — who are on the airport’s board and have staked their reputations to the project. Both are members of the Social Democrats, the opposition party to the government of Chancellor Angela Merkel. Members of her administration and other lawmakers have called for the two to step down from the board.
Mr. Platzeck, premier of Brandenburg, the largely rural state that surrounds Berlin, confirmed Tuesday that the airport’s board had been advised to abandon the March deadline as unfeasible. The board, which had planned to meet next week to complete a new timetable and proposals for additional financing, will now meet on Friday.
Spokesmen for the airport and the main project partners — the city of Berlin, the state of Brandenburg and Germany’s federal government — declined to comment on the new opening date ahead of that Friday meeting.
But one government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, confirmed that the airport’s new chief operating officer, Horst Amann, had proposed at a meeting with stakeholders late Monday that the opening be postponed until at least Oct. 20, 2013.
‘’We think this sounds like a more realistic date,” Oliver Wagner, a senior vice president at Lufthansa who is in charge of the airline’s Berlin operations, said in response to the reported new date. Mr. Wagner has been keeping close tabs on the airport-in-progress, where Lufthansa has invested €60 million in new lounges and jet maintenance facilities.
“For us, the issue has always been that quality comes first,” Mr. Wagner said. “It has never been a matter of sacrificing reliability for speed.”
But, he added, “the whole industry has certainly been suffering from this situation.” And he acknowledged the problems caused by the strike at his own company. “It is a bit sad for the image of the industry,” he said. “This is what really what worries me most.”
The delayed airport was envisioned at the time of Germany’s reunification as a central aviation hub for the Berlin in place of three — Tegel, Schönefeld in the former East Germany and the now-shuttered Tempelhof in the former West — that would serve both as a gleaming symbol of a united capital and attract new travelers and commerce to and from northeastern Europe.
Berlin-Brandenburg, with expected capacity of up to 45 million passengers per year, was also expected to relieve mounting congestion at the capital’s much-loved but well-worn Tegel. Air traffic in Berlin has more than doubled since 2000 to around 24 million passengers per year, and Tegel, designed for a maximum capacity of around 7 million, now struggles to accommodate around 17 million.
Schönefeld, whose terminal is 18 kilometers, or 11 miles, southeast of the capital and adjacent to the new airport site, has until now been the main portal for low-cost carriers, including easyJet, Lufthansa’s Germanwings subsidiary, and Ryanair.
The Berlin-Brandenburg dream quickly transformed into a nightmare of politicized wrangling among leaders of debt-plagued local government. There have also been the challenges from residents of well-heeled suburbs in Brandenburg and the southwest of the capital, who fought bitterly to have the proposed flight patterns changed to avoid noise pollution. Others living near the existing airport were against the added congestion the new one could bring. Preservationists, meantime, fought the project on architectural grounds. Years of protests and legal challenges ensued.
Then, in mid-2010, the main engineering firm overseeing the airport’s construction filed for bankruptcy protection, throwing off an initial opening planned for October 2011 by seven months, to June of this year.
But by late last year, aviation industry executives said, it was clear that construction was far behind schedule, threatening the June deadline. Among the hang-ups: blueprints detailing the complex routes of critical cables for the airport’s security systems contained major errors; delays in the baggage sorting equipment, and the snags in the installation and testing of fire-safety equipment.
By this spring, “the number of open issues on the list kept growing instead of shrinking,” said one senior airline executive, who insisted on anonymity to avoid alienating government officials.
It was not until May 9, less than a month before the scheduled opening, that project officials and the board conceded the timeline could not be met and a new start date of March 17, 2013 set.
The 11th-hour decision forced airlines, which had already published their summer travel schedules and sold thousands of tickets for flights into and out of the new airport, into a scramble to regroup.
Mr. Wagner of Lufthansa, which had expected to operate more than 1,000 flights per week from Berlin-Brandenburg this summer, said the carrier was managing, so far, in maintaining its schedule with a minimum number of delays. Like most other carriers, he said, Lufthansa planned to seek significant compensation from the airport for the delays.
But Air Berlin, which carries more than 220,000 passengers in an out of the German capital each week — well ahead of Lufthansa, at 143,000 – has been the hardest hit. With the help of a sizeable investment last year from Etihad Airways of Abu Dhabi, the company, which has not recorded an annual profit in four years, is seeking to transform itself from a primarily low-cost carrier to a full-service network airline. Key to that strategy was the new airport, which it planned to use as a hub for connecting domestic passengers to a broader menu of inter-continental routes.
In an e-mail Tuesday, Mathias Radowski, an Air Berlin spokesman, said the airport was deferring comment until after Friday’s airport board meeting. But he stressed that its current base at Tegel was “not dimensioned for the high number of flights operated there at the moment.”
He added: ‘’We would be pleased not to spend another summer on Tegel airport.”
Analysts said they remained puzzled why the airport’s troubles went unacknowledged for so long, particularly in a country that famously prides itself on its efficiency and technical prowess.
“Obviously the problems were a lot deeper than they anticipated,” said Cathy Buyck, an aviation analyst at the Center for Aviation in Brussels. “But they are Germans after all. They are supposed to be organized.”
Nicola Clark reported from Paris. Melissa Eddy contributed reporting from Berlin.
nytimes.com
mermaid ha scritto:Vielen Dank Fabri.....![]()
![]()
Quotonemermaid ha scritto:Vielen Dank Fabri.....![]()
![]()
Scusa ma che significa?camicius ha scritto: Mi faccio un cartello da alzare tutte le volte che mi porteranno la germania come esempio di efficienza e di efficacia...
Questo è un esempio di inefficienza e di inefficacia.MarcoGT ha scritto:Scusa ma che significa?camicius ha scritto: Mi faccio un cartello da alzare tutte le volte che mi porteranno la germania come esempio di efficienza e di efficacia...